Example 1: fixed price versus time-and-materials (example assumption)
| Items | Materials, call-out, disposal, painting |
|---|---|
| Quote A – model | fixed price, gross |
| Quote A – lump sum | €2,400.00 |
| Quote A – items | materials and call-out included, disposal 180, painting 300 |
| Quote B – model | time-and-materials, gross |
| Quote B – rate | €55.00 |
| Quote B – workers | 2 people |
| Quote B – hours per person | 16 / 18 / 22 (low / base / high) |
| Quote B – items | materials 420, call-out 90, disposal 180, painting 300 |
| Quote A – comparable total (base) | €2,880.00 |
|---|---|
| Quote B – comparable total (base) | €2,970.00 |
| Difference B against A (base) | €90.00 |
| Cheapest (low / base / high) | B / A / A |
| Break-even B against A | 17.18 hours per person |
Quote A names €2,400.00 but prices disposal and painting separately, so the comparable figure is €2,880.00. For quote B, 55 × 2 people × 18 hours = €1,980.00 of labour plus €990.00 of items = €2,970.00. In the base scenario A is cheaper by €90.00, a surcharge of 3.125% on A. With fewer hours (low) B leads; with more hours (high) A does. The two are level at about 17.18 hours per person, which is 34.36 person-hours in total. All figures are example assumptions.